Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 05/17] xen/passthrough: x86: Use INVALID_GFN rather than INVALID_MFN

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 28/06/16 17:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 28/06/16 18:43, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 28/06/16 17:17, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > A variable containing a guest frame should be compared to INVALID_GFN
> > > and not INVALID_GFN.
> I think the text should be changed? I'd expect one 'G' being replaced
> bay 'M'. :-)
Correct, the second should be replaced by a 'M'. Thank you for spotting it.

Cheers,

> > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > I suspect these (mis)uses predate my movement of INVALID_GFN from x86
> > paging code to common code.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel