[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/vm_event: Add HVM debug exception vm_events
>>> On 23.06.16 at 19:07, <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c > @@ -3373,10 +3373,39 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs) > HVMTRACE_1D(TRAP_DEBUG, exit_qualification); > write_debugreg(6, exit_qualification | DR_STATUS_RESERVED_ONE); > if ( !v->domain->debugger_attached ) > - vmx_propagate_intr(intr_info); > + { > + unsigned long insn_len = 0; > + int rc; > + unsigned long trap_type = MASK_EXTR(intr_info, > + > INTR_INFO_INTR_TYPE_MASK); > + > + if ( trap_type >= X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT ) > + __vmread(VM_EXIT_INSTRUCTION_LEN, &insn_len); > + > + rc = hvm_monitor_debug(regs->eip, > + HVM_MONITOR_DEBUG_EXCEPTION, > + trap_type, insn_len); > + > + /* > + * !rc continue normally > + * rc > paused waiting for response, work here is done > + * rc < error, fall-through to exit_and_crash > + */ > + if ( !rc ) > + { > + vmx_propagate_intr(intr_info); > + break; > + } > + if ( rc > 0 ) > + break; > + } > else > + { > domain_pause_for_debugger(); > - break; > + break; > + } > + > + goto exit_and_crash; I continue to think this is sub-optimal structuring (at once needlessly making the patch larger), but it'll be the VMX maintainers to judge. For the few pieces it is relevant for: Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |