Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/11] public / x86: introduce hvmctl hypercall

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 20/06/16 13:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> +/*
> + * Note that this value is effectively part of the ABI, even if we don't need
> + * to make it a formal part of it.  Hence this value may only be changed if
> + * accompanied by a suitable interface version increase.
> + */
> +#define HVMCTL_iter_shift 8
> +#define HVMCTL_iter_mask  ((1U << HVMCTL_iter_shift) - 1)
> +#define HVMCTL_iter_max   (1U << (16 + HVMCTL_iter_shift))

This (mis)use of the cmd parameter is surely no longer necessary, given
that there is space in xen_hvmctl_t to encode continuation information?

~Andrew


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel