[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] xen/arm: p2m_cache_flush: Use the correct terminology and typesafe gfn
On 20/06/16 16:03, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 20/06/16 15:53, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 20/06/16 14:37, Julien Grall wrote: >>> p2m_cache_flush is expecting GFNs in parameter and not MFNs. Rename >>> the variable to *gfn* and use typesafe to avoid possible misusage. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> >> >> On arm32, xen_pfn_t was uint64_t, but gfn_t is unsigned long. >> >> Is the truncation ok? > > The PFN will be encoded on 28 bits maximum (40 bits address). Unless > we want to check that the guest effectively zeroed the unused bits, I > think the truncation is fine. Ok - I was just checking that it wasn't happening accidentally. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |