| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/7] vm-event: introduce vm_event_vcpu_enter
 
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxFrom: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 14:40:08 +0300Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:40:08 +0000List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org> 
 
On 6/17/2016 11:55 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
 
Hello,
On 16/06/16 15:08, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
index d31f821..ba248c8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
  #include <xen/errno.h>
  #include <xen/bitops.h>
  #include <xen/grant_table.h>
+#include <xen/vm_event.h>
  #include <asm/current.h>
  #include <asm/event.h>
@@ -251,6 +252,8 @@ static void schedule_tail(struct vcpu *prev)
      ctxt_switch_to(current);
+    vm_event_vcpu_enter(current);
+
      local_irq_enable();
      context_saved(prev);
@@ -296,7 +299,7 @@ void context_switch(struct vcpu *prev, struct 
vcpu *next)
  void continue_running(struct vcpu *same)
  {
-    /* Nothing to do */
+    vm_event_vcpu_enter(same);
  }
  void sync_local_execstate(void)
 
From my understanding of the commit message, vm_event_vcpu_enter 
should be called before returning to the guest. The scheduling 
functions are not called every-time Xen is returning to the guest. So 
if you want to do every time Xen is re-entering to the guest, then 
this should be done in leave_hypervisor_tail. 
Regards,
 
Which is also done, vm_event_vcpu_enter is called from 
leave_hypervisor_tail as well.
Are you saying that calling from leave_hypervisor_tail is enough and 
that the schedule_tail call is not necessary? 
Thanks,
Corneliu.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
 
 |