|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue
>>> On 14.06.16 at 10:10, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On June 13, 2016 11:52 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> "Xu, Quan" <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> 06/13/16 5:22 PM >>>
>> >From: Quan Xu <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >@@ -546,17 +550,37 @@ static int __must_check iommu_flush_all(void)
>> >struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd; struct iommu *iommu; int flush_dev_iotlb;
>> >+ int rc = 0;
>> >
>> >flush_all_cache();
>> >for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd )
>> >{
>> >+ int iommu_rc, iommu_ret;
>> >+
>> >iommu = drhd->iommu;
>> >- iommu_flush_context_global(iommu, 0);
>> >+ iommu_rc = iommu_flush_context_global(iommu, 0);
>> >flush_dev_iotlb = find_ats_dev_drhd(iommu) ? 1 : 0;
>> >- iommu_flush_iotlb_global(iommu, 0, flush_dev_iotlb);
>> >+ iommu_ret = iommu_flush_iotlb_global(iommu, 0,
>> >+ flush_dev_iotlb);
>> >+
>> >+ /*
>> >+ * The current logic for returns:
>> >+ * - positive invoke iommu_flush_write_buffer to flush cache.
>> >+ * - zero on success.
>> >+ * - negative on failure. Continue to flush IOMMU IOTLB on a
>> >+ * best effort basis.
>> >+ */
>> >+ if ( iommu_rc > 0 || iommu_ret > 0 )
>> >+ iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu);
>> >+ if ( rc >= 0 )
>> >+ rc = iommu_rc;
>> >+ if ( rc >= 0 )
>> >+ rc = iommu_ret;
>>
>> First of all - is it correct to fold the two iommu_flush_write_buffer()
>> invocations?
>>
>
> Sure, it is correct..
>
> as:
> - For updates to remapping hardware structures that require context-cache,
> PASID-cache, IOTLB or IEC invalidation
> Operations to flush stale entries from the hardware caches, no additional
> action is required to make the modification
> Visible to hardware. This is because, hardware performs an implicit
> write-buffer-flushing as a pre-condition to context-cache,
> PASID-cache, IOTLB and IEC invalidation operations.
>
> - For updates to remapping hardware structures (such as modifying a currently
> not-present entry) that do not require
> Context-cache, IOTLB, or IEC invalidations, software must explicitly perform
> write-buffer-flushing to ensure the updated structures
> Are visible to hardware.
But that's not the point. Instead my question was related to Kevin's
concern towards you making assumptions on the behavior of
iommu_flush_context_global() vs iommu_flush_iotlb_global(): What
if the first returned 1 but the second didn't? It would seem to me
that in such a (theoretical) case iommu_flush_write_buffer() might
need to be invoked prior to the second flush function.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |