[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 09/11] vt-d: fix the IOMMU flush issue
>>> On 14.06.16 at 10:10, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On June 13, 2016 11:52 PM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> "Xu, Quan" <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> 06/13/16 5:22 PM >>> >> >From: Quan Xu <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> >> >@@ -546,17 +550,37 @@ static int __must_check iommu_flush_all(void) >> >struct acpi_drhd_unit *drhd; struct iommu *iommu; int flush_dev_iotlb; >> >+ int rc = 0; >> > >> >flush_all_cache(); >> >for_each_drhd_unit ( drhd ) >> >{ >> >+ int iommu_rc, iommu_ret; >> >+ >> >iommu = drhd->iommu; >> >- iommu_flush_context_global(iommu, 0); >> >+ iommu_rc = iommu_flush_context_global(iommu, 0); >> >flush_dev_iotlb = find_ats_dev_drhd(iommu) ? 1 : 0; >> >- iommu_flush_iotlb_global(iommu, 0, flush_dev_iotlb); >> >+ iommu_ret = iommu_flush_iotlb_global(iommu, 0, >> >+ flush_dev_iotlb); >> >+ >> >+ /* >> >+ * The current logic for returns: >> >+ * - positive invoke iommu_flush_write_buffer to flush cache. >> >+ * - zero on success. >> >+ * - negative on failure. Continue to flush IOMMU IOTLB on a >> >+ * best effort basis. >> >+ */ >> >+ if ( iommu_rc > 0 || iommu_ret > 0 ) >> >+ iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu); >> >+ if ( rc >= 0 ) >> >+ rc = iommu_rc; >> >+ if ( rc >= 0 ) >> >+ rc = iommu_ret; >> >> First of all - is it correct to fold the two iommu_flush_write_buffer() >> invocations? >> > > Sure, it is correct.. > > as: > - For updates to remapping hardware structures that require context-cache, > PASID-cache, IOTLB or IEC invalidation > Operations to flush stale entries from the hardware caches, no additional > action is required to make the modification > Visible to hardware. This is because, hardware performs an implicit > write-buffer-flushing as a pre-condition to context-cache, > PASID-cache, IOTLB and IEC invalidation operations. > > - For updates to remapping hardware structures (such as modifying a currently > not-present entry) that do not require > Context-cache, IOTLB, or IEC invalidations, software must explicitly perform > write-buffer-flushing to ensure the updated structures > Are visible to hardware. But that's not the point. Instead my question was related to Kevin's concern towards you making assumptions on the behavior of iommu_flush_context_global() vs iommu_flush_iotlb_global(): What if the first returned 1 but the second didn't? It would seem to me that in such a (theoretical) case iommu_flush_write_buffer() might need to be invoked prior to the second flush function. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |