[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND 13/14] libxl/arm: initialize memory information of ACPI blob
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Assign the guest memory space for ACPI tables and replace the reg in DT > with real values. > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c b/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c > index 64a8b67..e21e3e9 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_dom_arm.c > @@ -383,9 +383,11 @@ static int meminit(struct xc_dom_image *dom) > const uint64_t kernsize = kernend - kernbase; > const uint64_t dtb_size = dom->devicetree_blob ? > ROUNDUP(dom->devicetree_size, XC_PAGE_SHIFT) : 0; > + const uint64_t acpi_size = dom->acpitable_blob ? > + ROUNDUP(dom->acpitable_size, XC_PAGE_SHIFT) : 0; > const uint64_t ramdisk_size = dom->ramdisk_blob ? > ROUNDUP(dom->ramdisk_size, XC_PAGE_SHIFT) : 0; > - const uint64_t modsize = dtb_size + ramdisk_size; > + const uint64_t modsize = dtb_size + acpi_size + ramdisk_size; > const uint64_t ram128mb = bankbase[0] + (128<<20); > > xen_pfn_t p2m_size; > @@ -500,6 +502,18 @@ static int meminit(struct xc_dom_image *dom) > modbase += dtb_size; > } > > + if ( acpi_size ) > + { > + dom->acpi_seg.vstart = modbase; > + dom->acpi_seg.vend = modbase + acpi_size; > + > + DOMPRINTF("%s: acpi: 0x%" PRIx64 " -> 0x%" PRIx64 "", > + __FUNCTION__, > + dom->acpi_seg.vstart, dom->acpi_seg.vend); > + > + modbase += dtb_size; shouldn't this be modbase += acpi_size ? > + } > + > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c > index e7cb578..bf1eeea 100644 > --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c > +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_arm.c > @@ -230,6 +230,27 @@ static int fdt_property_regs(libxl__gc *gc, void *fdt, > return fdt_property(fdt, "reg", regs, sizeof(regs)); > } > > +static int fdt_property_inplace_regs(void *fdt, int nodeoffset, > + unsigned addr_cells, unsigned > size_cells, > + unsigned num_regs, ...) > +{ > + uint32_t regs[num_regs*(addr_cells+size_cells)]; > + be32 *cells = ®s[0]; > + int i; > + va_list ap; > + uint64_t base, size; > + > + va_start(ap, num_regs); > + for (i = 0 ; i < num_regs; i++) { > + base = addr_cells ? va_arg(ap, uint64_t) : 0; > + size = size_cells ? va_arg(ap, uint64_t) : 0; > + set_range(&cells, addr_cells, size_cells, base, size); > + } > + va_end(ap); > + > + return fdt_setprop_inplace(fdt, nodeoffset, "reg", regs, sizeof(regs)); > +} The va_arg stuff is a bit overkill. Also, can't you call finalise_one_memory_node instead? > static int make_root_properties(libxl__gc *gc, > const libxl_version_info *vers, > void *fdt) > @@ -1209,6 +1230,8 @@ int > libxl__arch_domain_finalise_hw_description(libxl__gc *gc, > > const struct xc_dom_seg *ramdisk = dom->ramdisk_blob ? > &dom->ramdisk_seg : NULL; > + const struct xc_dom_seg *acpi = dom->acpitable_blob ? > + &dom->acpi_seg : NULL; > > if (ramdisk) { > int chosen, res; > @@ -1238,6 +1261,23 @@ int > libxl__arch_domain_finalise_hw_description(libxl__gc *gc, > > } > > + if (acpi) > + { > + int module, res; > + > + module = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/chosen/modules/module@0"); > + assert(module > 0); > + > + LOG(DEBUG, "/chosen/modules/module@0 updating acpi properties to > cover " > + "%"PRIx64"-%"PRIx64, > + acpi->vstart, acpi->vend); > + > + res = fdt_property_inplace_regs(fdt, module, ROOT_ADDRESS_CELLS, > + ROOT_SIZE_CELLS, 1, acpi->vstart, > + acpi->vend - acpi->vstart + 1); > + assert(!res); > + } > + > for (i = 0; i < GUEST_RAM_BANKS; i++) { > const uint64_t size = (uint64_t)dom->rambank_size[i] << > XC_PAGE_SHIFT; > > -- > 2.0.4 > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |