Re: [Xen-devel] Basic bare metal ARM domain interface

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

On 01/06/16 21:06, Ivan Pavic wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:53:06AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Julien,
Hello Ivan,

> thank you very much, I succeded with debug console and pin toggle (iomem).
> It's actually good that you answered late, because it made me look through xen
> traps.c and console.c code, so I recompiled xen few times. The main problem with
> was compiler, I think. I've always got data abort with hypervisor calls and
> similiar. Now I'm using gcc-linaro-arm-none-eabi-4.9 for both xen and
> application.
Your guest (i.e the application) and Xen should not need to be built 
with the same compiler.
Which compiler led to use a data abort? And where was the data abort? In 
Xen or the guest?
Regards,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel