[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] AMD IOMMU: Removing currently non-functioning guest iommu feature
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 04:43:32AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 02.06.16 at 12:26, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:55:41AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 01.06.16 at 21:52, <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > The guest IOMMU feature is currently not functioning. However, > >> > the current guest_iommu_init() is causing issue when it tries to > >> > register mmio handler because the it is currently called by the > >> > following code path: > >> > > >> > arch/x86/domain.c: arch_domain_create() > >> > ]- drivers/passthrough/iommu.c: iommu_domain_init() > >> > |- drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c: > >> > amd_iommu_domain_init(); > >> > |- drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_guest.c: guest_iommu_init() > >> > > >> > At this point, the hvm_domain_initialised() has not been called. > >> > So register_mmio_handler() in guest_iommu_init() silently fails. > >> > > >> > This patch removes the guest IOMMU feature for now until we can properly > >> > support it. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx> > >> > >> Thanks, quite reasonable. And imo actually a 4.7 candidate. Wei? > >> > > > > Release-acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Please apply this series within this week. > > Series? Also the other one, which is pretty benign imo? > Yes, the other one as well. I thought it you wanted this whole series in. But if you only want this one in, that's of course fine by me. Wei. > Jan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |