Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11 1/2] libxl: add support for vscsi

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] libxl: add support for vscsi"):
> What Ian wanted was that we need clear correlation of xl configuration
> syntax with libxl API fields. For example, for a FOO device

Thanks for explaining, yes.

> However, I don't think that can be easily achieved in the case of pvscsi
> because we need to support both legacy Xen-classic kernel and new PVOPS
> kernel. Olaf, please correct me if I'm wrong.

That is unfortunate.  Also I am confused, then: if it is not possible
to support a sensible semantics (with an appropriate syntax) at the
libxl level, how is it possible to do so at the xl level ?

(I confess I haven't reread the patch in detail today...)

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel