[Xen-devel] Policy for force pushing smoke branch Was: Re: [xen-unstable-smoke test] 88656: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Jackson writes ("Policy for force pushing smoke branch Was: Re: [Xen-devel] 
[xen-unstable-smoke test] 88656: regressions - FAIL"):
> Wei Liu writes ("Policy for force pushing smoke branch Was: Re: [Xen-devel] 
> [xen-unstable-smoke test] 88656: regressions - FAIL"):
> > It would take some time for libvirt fix to land and propagate to our own
> > mirror.
> 
> There is also a risk that the libvirt fix wouldn't pass osstest's push
> gate for the libvirt branch.
> 
> > I would like to avoid holding backing xen.git push for too long
> > if possible. So I'm for force-pushing the smoke branch and subsequently
> > master branch if necessary.
> 
> I concur.  I will wait a bit for contrary opinions, though.

I have now pushed a0f793d82d5ec2d0b67c57d7130bf01c91396c60 to smoke,
apropos of:

osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable-smoke test] 88672: regressions - 
FAIL"):
> flight 88672 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/88672/
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  build-amd64-libvirt           5 libvirt-build             fail REGR. vs. 
> 88144
> 
> version targeted for testing:
>  xen                  a0f793d82d5ec2d0b67c57d7130bf01c91396c60

I'll do a force push to xen.git#master if this is the only blocker,
too.  Also, any necessary force push of the osstest tested libvirt
branch.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel