Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/6] xentrace: ARM platform timestamp support

[Ben Sanda <Ben.Sanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stefano,

Thank you for the comments. In response:

> Changing cycles_t to uint64_t sounds good, but why did you move
> boot_count here from below?

I had to move it up so it would be defined for use in the updated
get_cycles() call: 
return READ_SYSREG64(CNTPCT_EL0) - boot_count;

Should get_cyclces not use boot_count? I included it as the normal
system time call uses it so I assumed this should be consistent.

Thanks,
Ben Sanda

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel