|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] libxl: check for dynamic device model start required
>>> On 3/25/2016 at 02:25 PM, in message <56F4D9D6.8030300@xxxxxxxx>, Juergen
>>> Gross
<jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25/03/16 03:06, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>> On 3/23/2016 at 08:24 PM, in message
> > <1458735847-9448-5-git-send-email-jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross
> > <jgross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Add a service routine checking whether a device model must be started
> >> after adding a device to a domain.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> tools/libxl/libxl.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >> tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> tools/libxl/libxl_internal.h | 4 ++++
> >> tools/libxl/libxl_pci.c | 3 +++
> >> tools/libxl/libxl_pvusb.c | 6 ++++++
> >> 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl.c b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> >> index dcd0951..2b4e36f 100644
> >> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> >> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> >> @@ -2084,6 +2084,9 @@ void libxl__device_vtpm_add(libxl__egc *egc,
> >> uint32_t
>
> >> domid,
> >> if (rc) goto out;
> >>
> >> DEVICE_ADD(vtpm, vtpms, domid, &vtpm_saved, COMPARE_DEVID,
> >> &d_config);
> >> +
> >> + rc = libxl__dm_check_start(gc, &d_config, domid);
> >> + if (rc) goto out;
> >> }
> >
> > Why is this check put inside the if (aodev->update_json) { }? I think it's
> >
> a common
> > check, so should move outside.
>
> It is the only case where the check makes sense: update_json isn't set
> when we are just creating the domain, in which case the test for the
> device model needed is already in place.
See. That's OK then.
Thanks,
Chunyan
> When the device is added to an
> already running domain update_json will always be true.
>
>
> Juergen
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |