Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] blkif.h: document scsi/0x12/0x83 node

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] blkif.h: document 
scsi/0x12/0x83 node"):
> On 22/03/16 14:10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Just think of it as a black box.
> 
> This isn't sufficient.
> 
> You are presenting a solution but have not properly described the
> problem so no one can evaluate whether the solution is appropriate.

I'm sorry to be awkward, but I'm afraid I do agree with David Vrabel's
messages in this thread.

I don't think this is a sterile academic conversation which would (if
satisfactorily answered) have no real implications.  Rather, if we
understood the use case properly, there would probably be implications
for whether how this functionality ought to be exposed via the libxl
API; whether blkfront should consume this information by default; and
so on.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel