|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] xen, cpupool: correct error handling when removing cpu from cpupool
>>> On 04.03.16 at 10:54, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/03/16 10:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 03.03.16 at 17:48, <JGross@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> if ( !ret )
>>> {
>>> ret = schedule_cpu_switch(cpu, NULL);
>>> if ( ret )
>>> - {
>>> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpupool_free_cpus);
>>> - goto out;
>>> + else
>>> + {
>>> + cpupool_moving_cpu = -1;
>>> + cpupool_put(cpupool_cpu_moving);
>>> + cpupool_cpu_moving = NULL;
>>> }
>>> - cpupool_moving_cpu = -1;
>>> - cpupool_put(cpupool_cpu_moving);
>>> - cpupool_cpu_moving = NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> for_each_domain_in_cpupool(d, c)
>>
>> So this now also eliminates the bypass of the loop the beginning of
>> which we can still see here - is that really intended, or wouldn't
>> this better be made conditional upon !ret?
>
> Did you look at the commit message? It is explaining exactly this
> behaviour.
Argh - I had looked, even twice (once before writing the
comment, and once before hitting the send button), but
nevertheless managed to not connect things together.
I'm sorry.
And I think this aspect (and only it) makes this a backport
candidate.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |