|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 03/22] arm/acpi: Add __acpi_map_table function for ARM
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.02.16 at 12:43, <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 29.02.16 at 11:54, <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> >> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>
> >> >> Implement __acpi_map_table function for ARM. Move FIX_ACPI_PAGES to
> >> >> common place and rename it to NUM_FIXMAP_ACPI_PAGES.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Are you sure, particularly with ...
> >>
> >> >> --- /dev/null
> >> >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/acpi/lib.c
> >> >> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> >> >> +/*
> >> >> + * lib.c - Architecture-Specific Low-Level ACPI Support
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + * Copyright (C) 2015, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + *
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> >> >> modify
> >> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published
> >> >> by
> >> >> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> >> + * (at your option) any later version.
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >> >> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> >> >> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >> >> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> >> >> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> >> >> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
> >> >> 02111-1307
> > USA
> >> >> + *
> >> >> + *
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> >> + */
> >> >> +
> >> >> +#include <xen/acpi.h>
> >> >> +#include <xen/mm.h>
> >> >> +#include <asm/config.h>
> >> >> +
> >> >> +char *__acpi_map_table(paddr_t phys, unsigned long size)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> + unsigned long base, offset, mapped_size;
> >> >> + int idx;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + offset = phys & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
> >> >> + mapped_size = PAGE_SIZE - offset;
> >> >> + set_fixmap(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN, phys >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> >> >> PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
> >> >> + base = FIXMAP_ADDR(FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN);
> >> >> +
> >> >> + /*
> >> >> + * Most cases can be covered by the below.
> >> >> + */
> >> >> + idx = FIXMAP_ACPI_BEGIN;
> >> >> + while (mapped_size < size) {
> >> >> + if (++idx > FIXMAP_ACPI_END)
> >> >> + return NULL; /* cannot handle this */
> >> >> + phys += PAGE_SIZE;
> >> >> + set_fixmap(idx, phys >> PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_HYPERVISOR);
> >> >> + mapped_size += PAGE_SIZE;
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + return ((char *) base + offset);
> >> >> +}
> >>
> >> ... this new file using Linux instead of Xen coding style?
> >
> > That's true, but it is clearly taken from
> > xen/arch/x86/acpi/lib.c:__acpi_map_table, which is also Linux coding
> > style.
>
> The main difference being that the x86 file is a clone of the Linux
> original, whereas the way the new ARM one gets introduced it
> doesn't look to be quite that way.
Fair enough, you are right, it would be nice if __acpi_map_table was
following the Xen coding style.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |