|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/xsaves: caculate the xstate_comp_offsets base on xcomp_bv
>>> On 22.02.16 at 06:35, <shuai.ruan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Previous patch using all available features caculate xstate_comp_offsets.
> This is wrong.This patch fix this bug by caculating the xstate_comp_offset
In the title and above: calculate (and alike).
> based on xcomp_bv of current guest.
> Also, the xstate_comp_offset should take alignment into consideration.
Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Ruan <shuai.ruan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> @@ -106,34 +107,44 @@ static int setup_xstate_features(bool_t bsp)
> xstate_sizes = xzalloc_array(unsigned int, xstate_features);
> if ( !xstate_sizes )
> return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + xstate_align = xzalloc_array(unsigned int, xstate_features);
> + if ( !xstate_align )
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> for ( leaf = 2; leaf < xstate_features; leaf++ )
> {
> if ( bsp )
> + {
> cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, leaf, &xstate_sizes[leaf],
> - &xstate_offsets[leaf], &tmp, &tmp);
> + &xstate_offsets[leaf], &ecx, &edx);
> + xstate_align[leaf] = ecx & XSTATE_ALIGN64;
> + }
Bogus hard tabs.
> -static void __init setup_xstate_comp(void)
> +static void setup_xstate_comp(const struct xsave_struct *xsave)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> + u64 xcomp_bv = xsave->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv;
It looks like it would suffice if the caller passed xcomp_bv into
this function.
> /*
> * The FP xstates and SSE xstates are legacy states. They are always
> * in the fixed offsets in the xsave area in either compacted form
> * or standard form.
> */
> + memset(xstate_comp_offsets, 0, sizeof(xstate_comp_offsets));
> xstate_comp_offsets[0] = 0;
The addition makes this line redundant. However, you act on
static data here, and I don't think there's any serialization
between the various callers.
> @@ -141,8 +152,10 @@ static void __init setup_xstate_comp(void)
>
> for ( i = 3; i < xstate_features; i++ )
> {
> - xstate_comp_offsets[i] = xstate_comp_offsets[i - 1] +
> - (((1ul << i) & xfeature_mask)
> + xstate_comp_offsets[i] = (xstate_align[i] ?
> + ROUNDUP(xstate_comp_offsets[i-1], 64) :
Coding style.
> @@ -172,6 +185,7 @@ void expand_xsave_states(struct vcpu *v, void *dest,
> unsigned int size)
> }
>
> ASSERT(xsave_area_compressed(xsave));
> + setup_xstate_comp(xsave);
> /*
Please add a blank line before the comment.
> @@ -223,6 +237,7 @@ void compress_xsave_states(struct vcpu *v, const void
> *src, unsigned int size)
> xsave->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv = xstate_bv;
> xsave->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv = v->arch.xcr0_accum |
> XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
>
> + setup_xstate_comp(xsave);
> /*
Please retain a blank line before the comment.
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/xstate.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
> #define XSTATE_LAZY (XSTATE_ALL & ~XSTATE_NONLAZY)
> #define XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED (1ULL << 63)
>
> +#define XSTATE_ALIGN64 (1ULL << 1)
> extern u64 xfeature_mask;
Missing blank line again.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |