|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv1 3/5] x86/fpu: Add a per-domain field to set the width of FIP/FDP
>>> On 18.02.16 at 19:52, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The x86 architecture allows either: a) the 64-bit FIP/FDP registers to be
> restored (clearing FCS and FDS); or b) the 32-bit FIP/FDP and FCS/FDS
> registers to be restored (clearing the upper 32-bits).
>
> Add a per-domain field to indicate which of these options a guest needs.
> The options are: 8, 4 or 0. Where 0 indicates that the hypervisor should
> automatically guess the FIP width by checking the value of FIP/FDP when
> saving the state (this is the existing behaviour).
>
> The FIP width is initially automatic but is set explicitly in the following
> cases:
>
> - 32-bit PV guest: 4
> - 64-bit PV guest: 8
The latter is wrong: 64-bit OSes may, for the benefit of compat
mode processes, use 32-bit save/restore operations.
> @@ -261,28 +261,8 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask)
> "=m" (*ptr), \
> "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr))
>
> - if ( word_size <= 0 || !is_pv_32bit_vcpu(v) )
> + if ( fip_width != 4 )
> {
> - typeof(ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel) fcs = ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel;
> - typeof(ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel) fds = ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel;
> -
> - if ( cpu_has_xsaveopt || cpu_has_xsaves )
> - {
> - /*
> - * XSAVEOPT/XSAVES may not write the FPU portion even when the
> - * respective mask bit is set. For the check further down to work
> - * we hence need to put the save image back into the state that
> - * it was in right after the previous XSAVEOPT.
> - */
> - if ( word_size > 0 &&
> - (ptr->fpu_sse.x[FPU_WORD_SIZE_OFFSET] == 4 ||
> - ptr->fpu_sse.x[FPU_WORD_SIZE_OFFSET] == 2) )
> - {
> - ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel = 0;
> - ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel = 0;
> - }
> - }
> -
> XSAVE("0x48,");
>
> if ( !(mask & ptr->xsave_hdr.xstate_bv & XSTATE_FP) ||
> @@ -293,15 +273,14 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask)
> (!(ptr->fpu_sse.fsw & 0x0080) &&
> boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD) )
> {
> - if ( (cpu_has_xsaveopt || cpu_has_xsaves) && word_size > 0 )
> - {
> - ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel = fcs;
> - ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel = fds;
> - }
> return;
I don't see how you can validly delete all of the above code without
any replacement. Can you explain the rationale behind this?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |