[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] x86emul: simplify IRET logic

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:03:07 +0000
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:03:13 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 17/02/16 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Since we only handle real mode, we need to consider neither non-ring0
> nor IOPL. Also for POPF the mode_iopl() check can really be inside the
> not-ring-0 body.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] x86: XSA-170 follow-up
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] x86emul: simplify IRET logic
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/2] build: convert xenoprof to Kconfig
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/5] VMX: fold redundant code
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/5] x86emul: simplify IRET logic
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/5] VMX: fold redundant code
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.