[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] xen/x86: merge 2 hvm_event_... functions into 1


  • To: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 19:40:33 +0200
  • Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:40:43 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=bitdefender.com; b=ETOzsRE91zozAI08QxuT4vFjI3QI/FvIaqMcgSrCysC1L0i6e0f9xkR3G17CAE+ziPbRPkAuVWzVTY1s2nCYAsD0xlylECmzfk1Ym6kxNENw9yE9LE3Fd7Qq8LHEPPGQgjFSx4pG1Q6valo3p/WIYcrrM3HTlfg9SXoySwZG29dKNgvryQIfPHMy71VM+svNz98jDuiD9/qAmSkAW2LUTTOvGiOFUxoDHq4KqhXJF5UjwtgF1oM/0USiuseRDjCujW5VYtOYEG0aWNm77W+3+VS0akT3Kh9+sAVvDZ5/0v5a0QFviISsCUxKg7RFdsL9/udUgsI0t6j+gahknArWmQ==; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Received:Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BitDefender-Scanner:X-BitDefender-Spam:X-BitDefender-SpamStamp:X-BitDefender-CF-Stamp;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 2/15/2016 10:30 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 02/15/2016 08:35 AM, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:
This patch merges almost identical functions hvm_event_int3 and
hvm_event_single_step into a single function called hvm_event_breakpoint.
Also fixes event.c file header comment in the process.

Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  xen/arch/x86/hvm/event.c        | 108 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
  xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c      |  15 +++---
  xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/event.h |  11 ++--
  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks,
Razvan


I forgot to ask: when getting an Acked-By response, should I include that patch in the next patch-series or ommit it? I've done that w/ the first patch in the last patch-series, but IDK if I was correct to do so.

Thanks,
Corneliu.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.