[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/30] xen/x86: Mask out unknown features from Xen's capabilities
>>> On 12.02.16 at 17:48, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/02/16 16:43, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 05.02.16 at 14:42, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpuid.c >>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ >>> +#include <xen/lib.h> >>> +#include <asm/cpuid.h> >>> + >>> +const uint32_t known_features[] = INIT_KNOWN_FEATURES; >>> + >>> +static void __maybe_unused build_assertions(void) >>> +{ >>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(known_features) != FSCAPINTS); >> This is sort of redundant with ... >> >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/cpuid.h >>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ >>> +#ifndef __X86_CPUID_H__ >>> +#define __X86_CPUID_H__ >>> + >>> +#include <asm/cpuid-autogen.h> >>> + >>> +#define FSCAPINTS FEATURESET_NR_ENTRIES >>> + >>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ >>> +#include <xen/types.h> >>> + >>> +extern const uint32_t known_features[FSCAPINTS]; >> ... the use of FSCAPINTS here. You'd catch more mistakes if you >> just used [] here. > > Not quite. > > The extern gives an explicit size so other translation units can use > ARRAY_SIZE(). True. > Without the BUILD_BUG_ON(), const uint32_t known_features[] can actually > be longer than FSCAPINTS, and everything compiles fine. > > The BUILD_BUG_ON() were introduced following an off-by-one error > generating INIT_KNOWN_FEATURES, where ARRAY_SIZE(known_features) was > different in this translation unit than all others. But what if INIT_KNOWN_FEATURES inits fewer than the intended number of elements. The remaining array members will be zero, sure, but I think such a condition would suggest a mistake elsewhere, and hence might be worth flagging. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |