|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/8] x86/efi: Generate uefi_call_wrapper() when compiling with clang
On 10/02/16 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.02.16 at 21:01, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>
>> What is the GCC version check supposed to be achieving here? GCC has
>> supported this syntax since 3.0
> This is best answered by looking at where we've got these headers
> from - the gnu-efi package. It has ...
>
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/efibind.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/efibind.h
>> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ typedef uint64_t UINTN;
>> #endif
>> #endif
>>
>> -#if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4)
>> +#if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4) || __clang__
>> #define uefi_call_wrapper(func, va_num, ...) func(__VA_ARGS__)
>> #else
>> /* for x86_64, EFI_FUNCTION_WRAPPER must be defined */
> /* for x86_64, EFI_FUNCTION_WRAPPER must be defined */
> #if defined(HAVE_USE_MS_ABI)
> #define uefi_call_wrapper(func, va_num, ...) func(__VA_ARGS__)
> #else
> UINTN uefi_call_wrapper(void *func, unsigned long va_num, ...);
> #endif
> #define EFI_FUNCTION __attribute__((ms_abi))
>
> I think this makes clear that the needed feature here is the
> attribute, which certainly wasn't available in older gcc.
>
> With that the question is whether the Clang case won't also need
> a version check, since I can't imagine them having supported this
> prior to gcc introducing it.
Clang has an substantially more sane way than GCC of checking for
individual features. I will introduce and use the
__has_{attribute,feature}() infrastructure to tests like this.
Experimentally, Clang 3.5 does have ms_abi support
~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |