Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: rewrite the start info structure definition in binary form

[Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich, on Tue 09 Feb 2016 01:14:13 -0700, wrote:
> >>> On 05.02.16 at 16:45, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > El 5/2/16 a les 14:13, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
> >> But
> >> even then - wouldn't what I've read on the other thread mean
> >> at least the filename should be put there (as kind of the first
> >> command line element)?
> > 
> > Really? I didn't get that impression at all, what's the filename useful
> > for anyway?
> 
> This largely depends on whether you mean to mimic multiboot1 or
> multiboot2. Remember the placeholder people have to add to
> certain grub2 invocation lines? I think that's a result of their
> attempt to had through a file name.

Yes. For gnumach we've been adding the file name by hand in the command
line. Otherwise the resulting tasks would have at best their first
parameter as task name, since gnumach has no idea what these modules...

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel