Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements

[PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/01/2016 11:14 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > Is 'HVMLite' replacing 'PVH'? Or are they separate modes?
> Yes, HVMlite is replacing PVH. Probably once we get dom0 support.
If that's a 'done deal', and it sounds like it is, it'd be useful to 
have it integrated into:
  http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Understanding_the_Virtualization_Spectrum

particularly as there's no mention of HVMlite on the wiki, at all.

It's unclear whether PVH, in its current dev state (at least here), is 
worth-the-visit -- especially if HVMlite is "ComingSoon(tm)".
I suppose I'm looking for some guidance as to which to invest time in 
while on Xen 4.6.0, ack'ing that neither PVH nor HVMlite are 
production-ready.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel