[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
- To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 20:06:16 +0100
- Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@xxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 19:06:39 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:01:00AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Also, wasn't Christoph looking at making per-device DMA ops more
> generic instead of an 'archdata' thing on basically every platform? Or
> did I just imagine that part?
What I've done for 4.5 is to switch all architectures to use DMA ops.
This should make it fairly easy to have a generic dma ops pointer in the
devie structure, but I have no need for that yet, and thus no short term
plans to do that work myself.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
