Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/6] x86/PV: allow PV guests to have an emulated PIT

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 21.01.16 at 17:51, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This fixes the fallout from the HVMlite series, that removed the emulated
> PIT from PV(H) guests. Also, this patch forces the hardware domain to
> always have an emulated PIT, regardless of whether the toolstack specified
> one or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monnà <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
albeit ...

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> @@ -542,8 +542,11 @@ int arch_domain_create(struct domain *d, unsigned int 
> domcr_flags,
>                     d->domain_id, config->emulation_flags);
>              return -EINVAL;
>          }
> +        if ( is_hardware_domain(d) )
> +            config->emulation_flags |= XEN_X86_EMU_PIT;
>          if ( config->emulation_flags != 0 &&
> -             (!is_hvm_domain(d) || config->emulation_flags != 
> XEN_X86_EMU_ALL) )
> +             (is_hvm_domain(d) ? (config->emulation_flags != 
> XEN_X86_EMU_ALL) :
> +                                 (config->emulation_flags != 
> XEN_X86_EMU_PIT)) )
>          {

... you having chosen the != route instead of the suggested &
one, I guess I'll take the liberty to further simplify this while
committing (as the ?: is now only needed on the right side of the
!= and I'm generally of the opinion that redundancy like this is
hampering readability).

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel