[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:56:35PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a > >>> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which > >>> I've folded in, it seems that works but if we care about ICC those > >>> folks should perhaps help review as well. > >> > >> I didn't know the kernel could even be compiled with ICC? Thought > >> only GCC worked? > > > > I'm happy with that, just wanted to make sure I raise the flag concern > > given the icc hacks on the linker tables. > > > >> Anyhow - it may be that those fixes were for quite old ICC versions. > >> Does the latest one manifest these oddities? > > > > I am not sure, I yield to Michael as the author of the original ICC > > compatibility pieces. If we don't care about ICC let me know and I'll > > just drop the stuff. In lack of such statements I'll just keep the > > work arounds in place, but I'm more than trilled to drop it. > > > > In general we let the ICC and Clang/LLVM teams communicate with out a > post facto. We can't just guess what their requirements are, especially > since they are likely to change between revisions. Great. I'm going to drop ICC hacks. Luis _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |