[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 6/7] vmx: VT-d posted-interrupt core logic handling
On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 04:35 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 20.01.16 at 12:20, <feng.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >Â > > > Then you didn't understand: The question isn't this path, but the > > > path where the hook gets called if non-NULL (and hence the > > > possibility to avoid such needless calls). > > > > I understand you mean the overhead happens when the hooks > > is called. My point is the hook is not called in a critical path, > > so I doubt > > whether it worth doing so to make the logic complex. > > Are you sure scheduling code is not a critical path? > TBH, I like Jan's point... It's always good to make all we can to avoid calling the hook, if unnecessary. Does it really complicates things a lot? Feng, can you give it a try? Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |