Re: [Xen-devel] Backports for Xen 4.6

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.01.16 at 16:53, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Possibly also:
> 42940c046902 "x86/shadow: Fix missing newline in dprintk()"

The affected statement compiles to nothing in a release build, which
can be taken as an argument both ways. I lean towards not putting
it in.

> 6851e979874e "VT-d: use proper error codes in iommu_enable_x2apic_IR()"

Since I had pulled this into our own tree already, and since you're
now also viewing this as useful, I guess I will throw it in.

> 0ce647ad6f70 "x86: suppress bogus log message"

This being a purely cosmetic change, may I ask for the reason
you consider this a backport candidate?

> 484c14b7254e "x86/vmx: enable PML by default"

Not in a point release I would say.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel