[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] tools: introduce parameter max_ranges.
On 1/20/2016 11:58 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 11:33 AMAs a feature this write-protection has nothing to be GPU virtualization specific. In the future the same mediated pass-through idea used in XenGT may be used on other I/O devices which need to shadow some structure w/ requirement to write-protect guest memory. So it's not good to tie this to either XenGT or GTT.Thank you, Kevin. Well, if this parameter is not supposed to be xengt specific, we do not need to connect it with any xengt flag such as ."vgt=1" or "GVT-g=1". Hence the user will have to configure the max_wp_ram_ranges himself, right?Not always. The option can be configured manually by the user, or automatically set in the code when "vgt=1" is recognized. OK. That sounds more reasonable. :) To give a summary, I'll do the following changes in next version: 1> rename this new parameter to "max_wp_ram_ranges", then use this parameter as the wp-ram rangeset limit, for the I/O rangeset, keep MAX_NR_IO_RANGES as its limit; 2> clear the documentation part; 3> define a LIBXL_HAVE_XXX in libxl.h to indicate a new field in the build info; 4> We do not introduce the xengt flag by now, and will add code to automatically set the "max_wp_ram_ranges" after this flag is accepted in the future. Does anyone have more suggestions? :) B.R. Yu Thanks Kevin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |