[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: Convert shadow-paging to Kconfig
On 19/01/16 13:38, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 19.01.16 at 14:30, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 19/01/16 13:23, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 19.01.16 at 10:46, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 18:40 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Does this have any impact on migration of either PV or HVM guests? What >>>> about nested virt? >>> At least PV guests won't be migratable anymore when there's no >>> shadow mode. >> What? Shadow mode (or lack thereof) has no impact whatsoever on migration. > So how would log-dirty mode work for a PV guest without shadow > code? Oops yes. I am confusing the fact that logdirty and vram tracking are independent, rather than logdiry and shadow. (we have far too many modes) I should update the text to talk about migration. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |