Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 1/5] remus: don't call stream_continue() when doing failover

[Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 01/19/2016 12:45 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-18 at 13:40 +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> stream_continue() is used for migration to read emulator
>> xenstore data and emulator context. For remus, if we do
>> failover, we have read it in the checkpoint cycle, and
>> we only need to complete the stream.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  tools/libxl/libxl_stream_read.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_stream_read.c
>> b/tools/libxl/libxl_stream_read.c
>> index 258dec4..24305f4 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_stream_read.c
>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_stream_read.c
>> @@ -101,6 +101,19 @@
>>   *    - stream_write_emulator_done()
>>   *    - stream_continue()
>>   *
>> + * 4) Failover for remus
> 
> I don't think this is really #4 in the list which precedes it. I think a
> section "Failover for remus" would be absolutely fine right that the end of
> this comment block though, i.e. right after the "Depending on the
> contents..." paragraph.
> 
> Andy?
> 
>> + *    - we buffer all records until a CHECKPOINT_END record is received
>> + *    - we will use the records when a CHECKPOINT_END record is received
> 
> "we will consume the buffered records..."
> 
> 
>> + *    - if we find some internal error, the rc or retval is not 0 in
> 
> s/the/then/
> 
>> + *      libxl__xc_domain_restore_done(). In this case, we don't resume the
>> + *      guest
>> + *    - if we need to do failover from primary, the rc and retval are 0
> 
> s/the/then/ again and I would say "are both 0" for clarity (assuming that
> is indeed the requirement).
> 
>> + *      in libxl__xc_domain_restore_done(). In this case, the buffered state
>> + *      will be dropped, because we don't receive a CHECKPOINT_END record,
> 
>                                        haven't received
> 
>> + *      and it is a inconsistent state. In libxl__xc_domain_restore_done(),
> 
> "an inconsistent".
> 
> I think I would say "... and therefore the buffered state is inconsistent".

Sorry for may poor English... I will fix it in the next version.

> 
> -        stream_continue(egc, stream);
>> +        if (checkpointed_stream) {
>> +            /*
>> +             * Failover from primary. Domain state is currently at a
>> +             * consistent checkpoint, complete the stream, and call
>> +             * stream->completion_callback() to resume the guest.
>> +             */
>> +            stream_complete(egc, stream, 0);
> 
> Is it possible to get here having never received a single CHECKPOINT_END?

I will check the code first. I think xc_domain_restore() should not return
0 if it doesn't receive a single CHECKPOINT_END.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
> Ian.
> 
> 
> .
> 




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel