[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 08/16] xen/hvm/params: Add a new delivery type for event-channel in HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ
On 18/01/16 12:38, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: >> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add a new delivery type: >> val[63:56] == 3: val[15:8] is flag: val[7:0] is a PPI. >> To the flag, bit 0 stands the interrupt mode is edge(1) or level(0) and >> bit 1 stands the interrupt polarity is active low(1) or high(0). >> >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h >> b/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h >> index a6c7991..550688a 100644 >> --- a/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h >> +++ b/include/xen/interface/hvm/params.h >> @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ >> * Domain = val[47:32], Bus = val[31:16], >> * DevFn = val[15: 8], IntX = val[ 1: 0] >> * val[63:56] == 2: val[7:0] is a vector number. >> + * val[63:56] == 3: val[15:8] is flag of event-channel interrupt: >> + * bit 0: interrupt is edge(1) or level(0) triggered >> + * bit 1: interrupt is active low(1) or high(0) >> + * val[7:0] is PPI number used by event-channel. >> + * This is only used by ARM/ARM64. >> * If val == 0 then CPU0 event-channel notifications are not delivered. >> */ >> #define HVM_PARAM_CALLBACK_IRQ 0 > Andrew, I think that this patch is correct. Looking back at your > previous comment (http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=144804014214262&w=2), > is it possible that you were confused by enum callback_via_type, which > is internal to Xen and offset'ed by 1 compared to the described values > in xen/include/public/hvm/params.h? > > If not, and indeed somebody introduced one more field but failed to > document it, then I suggest she sends a patch to fix the issue as soon > as possible. I was indeed confused - the ABI is utterly mad. However, this change does need rebasing over c/s ca5c54b, which was the result of the original discussion. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |