Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL [and 2 more messages]

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - 
FAIL [and 2 more messages]"):
...
> The only downside is a spurious /boot/xenpolicy-$version installed when the
> corresponding Xen binary doesn't support XSM, however given the assumption
> in #2 (which implies the user will never see a spurious grub entry, which
> is the important thing) and the fact that it avoids the complexity of
> having tools/* rely in some way on xen/.config I think that is a worthwhile
> trade-off.

I like this plan and I think this downside is quite tolerable.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel