Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself for kconfig

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan,

Have you been convinced by the arguments made by others here or do we need
to put this to a formal vote? (I think "private majority vote amongst the
committers" is the next step here per the governance)

Ian.

On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 17:24 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> IMNSHO we should apply the patch.
> 
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 17:19 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote:
> > What is the outcome of this discussion?
> > Lars
> > 
> > On 06/01/2016 16:30, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Lars Kurth writes ("Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself for
> > > kconfig"):
> > > > As we have seen last year in the survey, in theory - aka according
> > > > to
> > > > our
> > > > governance - committers should always act on the wishes (ACKs) of
> > > > maintainers. In practice it comes down to whether the committers
> > > > trusts
> > > > a
> > > > maintainer enough to apply patches without a re-review. If we
> > > > follow
> > > > the
> > > > trust principle, which IMHO is not really in conflict with the
> > > > governance,
> > > > there shouldn't be an issue.
> > > 
> > > Precisely.
> > > 
> > > > That is unless, we plan to make changes to
> > > > how we operate, for which there does not seem to be consensus.
> > > 
> > > Quite.
> > > 
> > > Ian.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel