[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 77827: regressions - FAIL
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 16:48 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > osstest service owner writes ("[xen-unstable test] 77827: regressions - > FAIL"): > > flight 77827 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/77827/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > Âtest-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 9 debian-hvm- > > install fail REGR. vs. 66879 > > Looking at > > Â http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64- > i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/xen-unstable.html > > and > > Â http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64- > i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/ALL > > it seems that this test has been intermittently broken on most osstest > branches for some time.ÂÂ66879 was an [un]lucky pass.ÂÂ(The symptoms, > and hence the specific test step which fails, seem to vary according > to the host.) > > I am therefore going to force push this. > > > We had a discussion on IRC.ÂÂSeveral people were of the opinion that > 32-bit stubdom will be hard to fix and that the effort won't be worth > it. FWIW I agree. > If we are going to abandon this then we should switch to 64-bit > stubdom dm in 32-bit dom0 configurations, and certainly not any longer > build a probably-broken 32-bit stubdom dm along with the 32-bit tools. Full ack, particularly the second half. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |