Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 77945: regressions - FAIL

[Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/14/16 7:57 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 05:50 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 14.01.16 at 12:42, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The bisector is working:
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/bisect/xen-unstable
>>> /test 
>>> -amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm.xen-install.html
>>>
>>> and has gotten to this range:
>>>
>>>     $ git log --oneline 5513bd0b4675..20c8f1a8a5fd
>>>     20c8f1a convert XSM_ENABLE to Kconfig
>>>     529298f convert FLASK_ENABLE to Kconfig
>>>     361b4f9 build: save generated xen .config
>>>     e3cce17 x86/VPMU: implement ipc and arch filter flags
>>>
>>> I suspect the issue is that 529298f removes FLASK_ENABLE from the top-
>>> level, but that is used in tools/Makefile. i.e. there is that other
>>> patch
>>> which needed to go before the two included above.
>>
>> And is that other patch ready to go in? If not, do we need to
>> revert another time?
> 
> I think that is likely to be the case, yes.
> 
>> In any event - Doug, you should point out such dependencies in
>> the submission, e.g. after the first --- marker.
> 
> Really they should have been in the same series in this case.
> 
> Ian.
> 

They were all in the same thread. And were all acked. But the first one
against the tools shouldn't have been necessary, it should have still built.

-- 
Doug Goldstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel