[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/41] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
- To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 13:50:07 +0100
- Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, user-mode-linux-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, adi-buildroot-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-metag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 12:50:46 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 04:16:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I parked this in vhost tree for now, though the inclusion of patch 1 from tip
> creates a merge conflict - but one that is trivial to resolve.
>
> So I intend to just merge it all through my tree, including the
> duplicate patch, and assume conflict will be resolved.
>
> I would really appreciate some feedback on arch bits (especially the x86
> bits),
> and acks for merging this through the vhost tree.
Thanks for doing this, looks good to me.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
