[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to realize()
I used 6bb9ead762bf749af11ea225fc2a74db1b93c105 yesterday, this version don't include commit 349a3b1cc. Thanks, -Xudong > -----Original Message----- > From: Cao jin [mailto:caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 10:01 AM > To: Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx>; Stefano Stabellini > <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>; Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>; > xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stefano Stabellini > <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael S. Tsirkin > <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert to > realize() > > Hi > > On 01/11/2016 05:53 PM, Hao, Xudong wrote: > > Stefano, > > > > Patch http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=145137863501079 don't works for > qemu at all, some conflict when git apply. > > Patch http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=145137863501079 is based on > patch http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=145172165010604, right? > > > > I can boot up Linux VM with IGD pass-through with latest qemu (without any > additional patch), guest run 3D "nexuiz" and get 180fps. > > > > Because commit: 349a3b1cc is already in the latest qemu(maybe the day before > yesterday?), so I guess that is why latest qemu works well with igd-passthru > and > also the same reason for git apply conflict? > > > Will try the two patch together later. > > > > Thanks, > > -Xudong > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 7:57 PM > >> To: Hao, Xudong <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Lars Kurth > >> <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>; Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>; Cao > >> jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; > >> qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert > >> to realize() > >> > >> Since you are at it, could you please let me know how well igd > >> passthrough works without this bugfix: > >> > >> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=145172165010604 > >> > >> which is about to land in QEMU. I guess it doesn't work at all? > >> > >> I am asking because I would like to know the level of support we need > >> to provide to igd passthrough with the latest QEMU release (2.5). > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Hao, Xudong wrote: > >>> Sure. I'll test it soon. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> -Xudong > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2016 8:18 PM > >>>> To: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Hao, > >>>> Xudong <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx>; Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xxxxxxxxxx>; > >>>> Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >>>> Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; > >>>> qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx; Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] igd-passthrough-i440FX: convert > >>>> to realize() > >>>> > >>>> Hello Xudong, > >>>> > >>>> please test this patch: > >>>> > >>>> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=145137863501079 > >>>> > >>>> with an intel graphic card assigned to a Xen guest. If everything > >>>> still works as expected, please reply with your Tested-by. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Stefano > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Lars Kurth wrote: > >>>>> Hi folks, > >>>>> let me introduce you to Xudong from Intel, who is willing to help out. > >>>>> Best Regards > >>>>> Lars > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 4 Jan 2016, at 15:41, Stefano Stabellini > >>>>>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016, Lars Kurth wrote: > >>>>>>> On 04/01/2016 14:47, "Stefano Stabellini" > >>>>>>> <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Unfortunately I don't have a setup to test this either. Maybe > >>>>>>>> Lars can find out who should be involved on the Intel side on this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I can certainly help to this and get back to you. What exactly > >>>>>>> are we asking Intel to do? > >>>>>>> It is not clear to me from this email thread > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tiejun Chen, the author of the Intel graphic card passthrough > >>>>>> patches for QEMU, seems to have left the company. It would be > >>>>>> nice if somebody else tested this patch with an intel graphic > >>>>>> card assigned to a guest VM. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list > >>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel > >>>>> > >>> > > > > > > . > > > > -- > Yours Sincerely, > > Cao jin > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |