[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 25/28] libxl: emuids: Perhaps change dm xs control path
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 14:12 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH 25/28] libxl: emuids: Perhaps change dm > xs control path"): > > So, do I understand correctly that the states (combinations of bits) > > are: > > No. > > > Describing SPLIT as an "ID" is a bit odd (it's a kind of meta thing) > > but I > > suppose I can see why it is done this way. An alternative might be to > > have > > a separate bit for the PV|DM case together, maybe you discarded that > > possibility though? > > Perhaps things will be clearer with this comment, which I've just > added to add in this patch: Much thanks. One nit: >Â > Â * In xenstore we record which qemus a domain has.ÂÂThis is necessary > Â * for correct teardown.ÂÂAnd, we also record whether the xenstore > Â * paths are unified, as discussed above, so that subsequent libxl > Â * operations can do the right thing.ÂÂThis is what the EMUID_SPLIT > Â * flag is for. EMUID_SPLIT actually records the inverse (i.e. that they are split, rather than unified as the previous text is discussing). I knew what you meant though, and clarifying it could well make it less obvious I suspect. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |