Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v6 00/28] libxl: Deprivilege qemu

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [RFC PATCH v6 00/28] libxl: Deprivilege qemu"):
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Wei Liu wrote:
> > One aspect I don't see in this series is how save and restore for multiple
> > emulator context is handled.
> > 
> > Did I miss anything?
> 
> With the premise that I didn't have a chance to read the series yet, in
> the original design there aren't multiple emulators: one qemu instance
> is the emulator, the other only provides PV backends.

Right.  And the PV backends don't have any "emulator state" in that
sense.  They are simply torn down and recreated.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel