[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 12:44 +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2016, at 11:45, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > On 07.01.16 at 12:22, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer > > > supported. > > > Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I > > > always have > > > to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue. > > > > > > We should add rows to http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features > > > right > > > under Initial Release giving first the date until which that tree is > > > supported with backports and second the date until which security > > > support > > > will exist. We might also want to add a third "status" row. e.g. > > > "Supported", "Security Support only", "EOL" (we'll deal with extended > > > support by a third party when that next arises). > > > > > > I'm happy to make the edits, however I don't know what dates I would > > > write > > > here. Taking it to be 18 months of Support and a further 18 months of > > > security support I would get: > > Ian, that would be great. Can you ping me when done? Done. I dropped the "EOL - " prefixes, since it seems that if we forget to add them as new things are EOL'd then there would be ambiguity between things marked "EOL - Date" and things marked as just "Date" where Date is in the past -- i.e. folks might think the EOL didn't occur. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |