[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: make flask utils build unconditional
On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 14:37 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > which on the basis of this discussion I wasn't expecting. I didn't see this > new file on i686 or ARM*. > > My baseline is from the last time I committed, which would be last year, so > maybe something other than my current batch of patches has caused this. > > I'm going to drop this one for now and (hopefully) get the rest of the > batch squared away. Afterwards I'll take another look (with a new baseline > filelist), but if someone can explain it in the meantime that would be > super. So with a fresh basline I still see: --- ../FILE_LIST.BASE.staging.x86_64ÂÂÂÂ2016-01-05 14:50:32.000000000 +0000 +++ ../FILE_LIST.staging.x86_64 2016-01-05 15:11:15.000000000 +0000 @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Âdist/install/boot/xen-4.7-unstable.gz Âdist/install/boot/xen-4.gz Âdist/install/boot/xen.gz +dist/install/boot/xenpolicy-4.7-unstable Âdist/install/etc Âdist/install/etc/bash_completion.d Âdist/install/etc/bash_completion.d/xl.sh @@ -386,6 +387,12 @@ Âdist/install/usr/local/lib/xen/libexec Âdist/install/usr/local/lib/xen/libexec/qemu-bridge-helper Âdist/install/usr/local/sbin +dist/install/usr/local/sbin/flask-get-bool +dist/install/usr/local/sbin/flask-getenforce +dist/install/usr/local/sbin/flask-label-pci +dist/install/usr/local/sbin/flask-loadpolicy +dist/install/usr/local/sbin/flask-set-bool +dist/install/usr/local/sbin/flask-setenforce Âdist/install/usr/local/sbin/gdbsx Âdist/install/usr/local/sbin/gtracestat Âdist/install/usr/local/sbin/gtraceview *** FILES DIFFER *** On i686 and ARM* I only see the (expected) second hunk. I think the i686 case is explainable by the lack of a hypervisor build there, but I'm unsure why ARM* and x86_64 should differ in this regard. config/Tools.mk is y only on x86_64, not on the others, which obviously explains things, but the question is why only on x86_64 (I presume this has always been the case and it was previously masked, but I've not checked). Ah, OK, I misread AX_ARG_DEFAULT_ENABLE([xsmpolicy], [Disable XSM policy compilation]) as being default disable, actually the default is "enabled iff checkpolicy is installed" and it happens to be that it is only installed in my x86_64 build env. So, in the end I think Wei was correct and this change will now, in some circumstances, end up installing a /boot/xenpolicy-*. So the question is do we mind that? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |