[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 2/5] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] libxl: Fix libxl_set_memory_target return value"): > On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 17:37 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Can you go back to `lrc' for just that one use ? I think that would > > be analogous with CODING_STYLE's suggestion to use `rc' for libxl > > error codes. > > I was never quite sure what the "l" was supposed to reference, local? It seems to mean `local' to me. I was going to suggest `lrc' for this variable name even before I saw that it had already been `lrc' in a previous patch, which suggests it's a local maximum in probability space... Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |