Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] build: convert CONFIG_COMPAT to Kconfig

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/12/2015 21:49, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On 12/18/15 3:35 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 18/12/2015 20:06, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>>> Use the Kconfig generated CONFIG_COMPAT defines in the code base.
>>>
>>> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, although I have
>> a slight quibble.
>>
>>> ---
>>> This was previously Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> but then
>>> there was a request to change it to xen/common/Kconfig from
>>> xen/arch/x86/Kconfig. Unfortunately a small typo ('def_bool y' instead of
>>> 'bool') caused it to break on ARM. This resolves the issue and should be
>>> ready to merge.
>>> ---
>>>  config/x86_64.mk     | 1 -
>>>  xen/arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
>>>  xen/common/Kconfig   | 7 +++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/config/x86_64.mk b/config/x86_64.mk
>>> index f12d549..85fa27c 100644
>>> --- a/config/x86_64.mk
>>> +++ b/config/x86_64.mk
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ CONFIG_X86 := y
>>>  CONFIG_X86_64 := y
>>>  CONFIG_X86_$(XEN_OS) := y
>>>  
>>> -CONFIG_COMPAT := y
>>>  CONFIG_MIGRATE := y
>>>  CONFIG_XCUTILS := y
>>>  
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> index 07e366d..7d2ed96 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config X86_64
>>>  
>>>  config X86
>>>     def_bool y
>>> +   select COMPAT
>>>     select HAS_ACPI
>>>     select HAS_CPUFREQ
>>>     select HAS_EHCI
>>> diff --git a/xen/common/Kconfig b/xen/common/Kconfig
>>> index 7d0e9a9..046e257 100644
>>> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
>>>  
>>>  menu "Common Features"
>>>  
>>> +config COMPAT
>>> +   bool
>>> +   help
>>> +     32-bit interface support on 64-bit Xen which is used for both
>>> +     HVM and PV guests. HVMLoader makes 32-bit hypercalls irrespective
>>> +     of the destination runmode of the guest.
>> As this is now common, probably want to specify x86 HVM and PV guests. 
>> Arm guests are technically HVM, although the term is rather less common
>> on their side.
>>
>> ~Andrew
>>
> How about:
>
> 32-bit interface support on 64-bit Xen which is used by x86 HVM and PV
> guests and ARM HVM guests. The reason this is used for HVM guests is
> that HVMLoader makes 32-bit hypercalls irrespective of the destination
> run mode of the guest.
>

The complication here is that arm doesn't yet support compat.  There is
a hope to (which is, I guess, why Jan asked for it to be common), but it
shouldn't give any implication that it is available on ARM yet.

I am not overly familiar with the kconfig grammar.  Is there a sensible
way to limit the option to being visible only on x86, and only on 64bit
builds?  (even if arm supported compat, it wouldn't make sense to offer
it to arm32).

Or am I just talking my way back around to suggesting that it be an arch
specific option?

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel