[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/vPMU: constrain MSR_IA32_DS_AREA loads



On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
For one, loading the MSR with a possibly non-canonical address was
possible since the verification is conditional, while the MSR load
wasn't. And then for PV guests we need to further limit the range of
valid addresses to exclude the hypervisor range.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c
@@ -366,7 +366,8 @@ static inline void __core2_vpmu_load(str
      }
wrmsrl(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, core2_vpmu_cxt->fixed_ctrl);
-    wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area);
+    if ( vpmu_is_set(vcpu_vpmu(v), VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) )
+        wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_DS_AREA, core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area);
      wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, core2_vpmu_cxt->pebs_enable);
if ( !has_hvm_container_vcpu(v) )
@@ -415,8 +416,10 @@ static int core2_vpmu_verify(struct vcpu
              enabled_cntrs |= (1ULL << i);
      }
- if ( vpmu_is_set(vcpu_vpmu(v), VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) &&
-         !is_canonical_address(core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area) )
+    if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) &&
+         !(has_hvm_container_vcpu(v)
+           ? is_canonical_address(core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area)
+           : __addr_ok(core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area)) )

Should we instead of (or in addition to) this also make the same change in core2_vpmu_do_wrmsr()?

-boris

          return -EINVAL;
if ( (core2_vpmu_cxt->global_ctrl & enabled_cntrs) ||





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.