[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 3/5] libxl: add pvusb API
>>> On 12/14/2015 at 07:37 PM, in message <CAFLBxZZOwHysotU7zZUxytD0rWRYDO0LGsKzfeE9ZMmojZnU7g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Chun Yan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>>> On 12/10/2015 at 08:08 PM, in message <56696B4B.7060801@xxxxxxxxxx>, > >>>> George > > Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 10/12/15 12:05, George Dunlap wrote: > >> > From: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> > >> > > >> > Add pvusb APIs, including: > >> > - attach/detach (create/destroy) virtual usb controller. > >> > - attach/detach usb device > >> > - list usb controller and usb devices > >> > - some other helper functions > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> > >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Cao <caobosimon@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Attached is a diff of v9 -> v10 for convenience. > > > > Thanks very much, George! > > I've applied your new patch and tested, there are a couple of changes > needed to > > get tests PASSED. A small extra patch is written on top of your new patch, > as in > > attachment, please have a look. > > Thanks -- the changes in the patch look good. > > >> > +static int usbdev_get_all_interfaces(libxl__gc *gc, const char *busid, > >> > + char ***intfs, int *num) > >> > +{ > >> > + DIR *dir; > >> > + char *buf; > >> > + int rc; > >> > + > >> > + *intfs = NULL; > >> > + *num = 0; > >> > + > >> > + buf = GCSPRINTF("%s:", busid); > >> > + > >> > + dir = opendir(SYSFS_USB_DEV); > >> > + if (!dir) { > >> > + LOGE(ERROR, "opendir failed: '%s'", SYSFS_USB_DEV); > >> > + return ERROR_FAIL; > >> > + } > >> > + > >> > + size_t need = offsetof(struct dirent, d_name) + > >> > + pathconf(SYSFS_USB_DEV, _PC_NAME_MAX) + 1; > >> > + struct dirent *de_buf = libxl__zalloc(gc, need); > >> > >> Is this thing with manually calculating the size of the structure really > >> necessary? Could we not just declare "struct dirent de_buf" on the stack? > > > > Calculating in above way is to allocate enough space for d_name, whereas > > "struct dirent de_buf" won't allocate space for d_name (which is char *). > > > > Codes for calling read_dir_r are often done like above. > > OK -- in that case, can you put the allocation of the structure into a > macro or helper function, fold in the patch you sent, and re-send this > series as v11? OK. Will update soon! - Chunyan > > Thanks! > > -George > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |