[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 3/5] libxl: add pvusb API




>>> On 12/14/2015 at 07:37 PM, in message
<CAFLBxZZOwHysotU7zZUxytD0rWRYDO0LGsKzfeE9ZMmojZnU7g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George
Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Chun Yan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> > 
> > 
> >>>> On 12/10/2015 at 08:08 PM, in message <56696B4B.7060801@xxxxxxxxxx>, 
> >>>> George 
> > Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> >> On 10/12/15 12:05, George Dunlap wrote: 
> >> > From: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> 
> >> > 
> >> > Add pvusb APIs, including: 
> >> >  - attach/detach (create/destroy) virtual usb controller. 
> >> >  - attach/detach usb device 
> >> >  - list usb controller and usb devices 
> >> >  - some other helper functions 
> >> > 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Liu <cyliu@xxxxxxxx> 
> >> > Signed-off-by: Simon Cao <caobosimon@xxxxxxxxx> 
> >> > Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> 
> >> 
> >> Attached is a diff of v9 -> v10 for convenience. 
> > 
> > Thanks very much, George! 
> > I've applied your new patch and tested, there are a couple of changes  
> needed to 
> > get tests PASSED. A small extra patch is written on top of your new patch,  
> as in 
> > attachment, please have a look. 
>  
> Thanks -- the changes in the patch look good. 
>  
> >> > +static int usbdev_get_all_interfaces(libxl__gc *gc, const char *busid, 
> >> > +                                     char ***intfs, int *num) 
> >> > +{ 
> >> > +    DIR *dir; 
> >> > +    char *buf; 
> >> > +    int rc; 
> >> > + 
> >> > +    *intfs = NULL; 
> >> > +    *num = 0; 
> >> > + 
> >> > +    buf = GCSPRINTF("%s:", busid); 
> >> > + 
> >> > +    dir = opendir(SYSFS_USB_DEV); 
> >> > +    if (!dir) { 
> >> > +        LOGE(ERROR, "opendir failed: '%s'", SYSFS_USB_DEV); 
> >> > +        return ERROR_FAIL; 
> >> > +    } 
> >> > + 
> >> > +    size_t need = offsetof(struct dirent, d_name) + 
> >> > +        pathconf(SYSFS_USB_DEV, _PC_NAME_MAX) + 1; 
> >> > +    struct dirent *de_buf = libxl__zalloc(gc, need); 
> >> 
> >> Is this thing with manually calculating the size of the structure really 
> >> necessary?  Could we not just declare "struct dirent de_buf" on the stack? 
> > 
> > Calculating in above way is to allocate enough space for d_name, whereas 
> > "struct dirent de_buf" won't allocate space for d_name (which is char *). 
> > 
> > Codes for calling read_dir_r are often done like above. 
>  
> OK -- in that case, can you put the allocation of the structure into a 
> macro or helper function, fold in the patch you sent, and re-send this 
> series as v11? 

OK. Will update soon!

- Chunyan

>  
> Thanks! 
>  
>  -George 
>  
>  



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.