|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv3 1/2] x86/ept: invalidate guest physical mappings on VMENTER
On 07/12/15 10:25, George Dunlap wrote:
>
> I took the past tense ("synced") to mean, "These CPUs have been
> brought into sync (or are no longer out of sync)". So they start out
> not-synced, so you initialize the bit to be clear; when an INVEPT is
> executed, they become synced, so you set the bit; and when you change
> the EPT tables, they are no longer synced so you clear the bit.
It didn't work like that though. I have retained the changed name and
meaning.
David
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |