Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 07/62] arm/acpi: Add arch_acpi_os_map_memory helper function for ARM

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 07.12.15 at 09:58, <zhaoshenglong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2015/11/30 22:47, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 23/11/15 11:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> >> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> > could you please add a couple of lines to the commit message mentioning
>>> > why __va(phys) is an acceptable implementation of arch_acpi_os_map_memory?
>> FWIW, I already asked this question multiple time on the previous series
>> without clear answer.
>> 
>> __va should only be used when the memory is direct-mapped to Xen (i.e
>> accessible directly). On ARM64, this is only the case for the RAM. Can
>> someone confirm the ACPI will always reside to the RAM?
> I checked this with the UEFI SPEC. It says in 2.3.6 AArch64 Platforms:
> "If ACPI is supported :
> â ACPI Tables loaded at boot time can be contained in memory of type
> EfiACPIReclaimMemory (recommended) or EfiACPIMemoryNVS."
> 
> So I think it means the ACPI tables will always reside in RAM.

I think NVS doesn't necessarily mean RAM.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel