[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] VPMU fixes

To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, "andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx" <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "jbeulich@xxxxxxxx" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 02:20:49 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:21:22 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
Thread-index: AQHRLFh1TQFl0N4BeE2G+uLHbTHP7Z6290OA
Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 0/3] VPMU fixes

> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:50 AM
> 
> * Limit VPMU support to PMU versions 2, 3 and 4 (emulated at version 3 level)
> * Always implement family 6 VPMU quirk.
>   ==>  Intel folks: is the quirk needed for all family 6 processors or can we
>                     limit it to certain models?

Let me confirm this information internally. btw could you provide a link
where you find out the original quirk information?

Thanks
Kevin


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] VPMU fixes
  - From: Dietmar Hahn

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] VPMU fixes
  - From: Boris Ostrovsky

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [linux-mingo-tip-master test] 65271: regressions - FAIL
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: XSETBV intercept needs to check CPL on SVM only
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Restore original maintainership of arch VPMU files
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] VPMU fixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.